COMPARISON

Pretty PDF vs Screenshot & Screen Capture Tools

Screenshots are quick but limited. PDFs are searchable, selectable, accessible, and printable. Here's when each makes sense -- and why PDFs are almost always the better choice for saving web content.

Free tier -- 3 PDFs per month. No credit card required.

Two ways to capture

Screenshots capture pixels -- a visual image of what's on screen. PDFs capture content -- structured text, images, and formatting in a reflowable document. Both preserve web content, but in fundamentally different ways with very different capabilities.

A screenshot is essentially a photograph of your screen. It records the exact appearance at a single moment, but throws away all the underlying structure. The text in a screenshot is just colored pixels -- you can't select it, search it, copy it, or reflow it. A PDF, by contrast, stores the actual text characters, preserves links and headings, and can be paginated, annotated, and printed at any size without quality loss.

This difference matters most when you want to use the content you've captured -- not just look at it.

Head to head

Feature-by-feature comparison

Every capability, side by side. See exactly where screenshots fall short and where Pretty PDF delivers.

Feature Screenshots Pretty PDF
Text searchable No -- image pixels only Yes -- full-text search
Text selectable / copyable No -- requires OCR Yes -- select, copy, paste
Accessible (screen readers) No -- no semantic structure Yes -- text and heading structure preserved
File size for long pages Very large -- scales with page length and resolution Compact -- text-based with optimized images
Print quality Fixed resolution -- blurry when scaled Vector text -- sharp at any size
Pagination Single long image Proper pages with page breaks
Editable / annotatable text No -- draw on image only Yes -- highlight, comment, annotate text
Link preservation No -- links are just pixels Yes -- clickable links preserved
Template styling No -- captures page as-is 5 professional templates (Clean, Minimal, Corporate, Academic, Dark)

Text searchability

This is the biggest difference. A screenshot is an image -- you can't search for a word, copy a paragraph, or highlight a sentence. A PDF contains structured text that's fully searchable, selectable, and copyable. For research, reference, or archival, searchable text is essential.

Consider a common scenario: you've saved 20 web articles for a research project. With screenshots, finding a specific quote means opening each image and visually scanning through them. With PDFs, you press Ctrl+F (or Cmd+F) and type the word you're looking for. Your PDF reader searches across documents instantly.

The same applies to copying. If you need to quote a passage from a saved article, a PDF lets you select and copy the text directly. With a screenshot, you'd need to retype it manually or run it through OCR software -- which introduces errors, especially with technical content, code snippets, or non-English text.

The long page problem

Full-page screenshots of long articles create enormous single images -- potentially 10,000+ pixels tall. They're unwieldy to scroll, can't be printed at readable size, and file sizes balloon with resolution. PDFs paginate naturally -- a 20-page article becomes a 20-page PDF with proper page breaks.

A full-page screenshot of a long technical article might produce a PNG file that's 1440 pixels wide and 15,000 pixels tall. At high DPI (2x for Retina), that's a 2880 x 30,000 pixel image. The file size can easily reach 20-30 MB for a single article. The same content as a Pretty PDF is typically 200-500 KB -- 50 to 100 times smaller.

Printing is another problem. That 15,000-pixel-tall image either gets shrunk to fit a single page (making the text microscopic) or printed across multiple pages with arbitrary cuts mid-sentence. A PDF has intelligent page breaks that avoid splitting paragraphs, headings, and images awkwardly.

Accessibility

Screenshots are inaccessible to screen readers and assistive technology -- they're just images with no semantic structure. PDFs preserve text, headings, and reading order. For organizations with accessibility requirements (and for basic good practice), PDFs are the accessible format.

A screen reader encountering a screenshot sees a single image element. Without alt text (which screenshot tools don't generate), the content is completely invisible to visually impaired users. A PDF, by contrast, contains the actual text content that screen readers can parse, navigate by headings, and read aloud.

This matters for compliance too. Organizations subject to WCAG, ADA, or Section 508 requirements need to share content in accessible formats. Distributing information as screenshots fails accessibility standards. PDFs with structured text meet the baseline requirement for text accessibility.

When screenshots make sense

Screenshots do have valid use cases where they're the right tool for the job:

  • Capturing visual layout and design -- When you need to show the exact visual appearance of a page, including its layout, colors, and spacing, a screenshot captures this faithfully. Design reviews, UI documentation, and visual QA all benefit from pixel-perfect capture.
  • Bug reports -- A screenshot showing exactly what the user sees -- broken layouts, misaligned elements, error messages in context -- is invaluable for debugging. The visual fidelity of a screenshot matters more than text searchability here.
  • Heavily visual content -- Infographics, design mockups, data visualizations, and other content where the visual presentation is the content. A PDF would reformat this content, losing the original visual intent.
  • Quick sharing on chat and social media -- Screenshots can be pasted directly into Slack, Discord, Twitter, or iMessage. They display inline without requiring the recipient to open a separate file. For quick, informal sharing, this convenience matters.

For everything else -- reference, archival, research, printing, professional sharing -- PDFs are the better choice. They preserve the content in a format that's searchable, accessible, compact, and designed for long-term use.

Frequently asked questions

For saving web content for reference, research, or archival -- yes. For capturing exact visual appearance (bug reports, design reviews), screenshots may be more appropriate since they show the exact pixel rendering. The key question is whether you need the content (use PDF) or the appearance (use screenshot).
No. Screenshots are images with no text data. You'd need OCR (optical character recognition) to extract text from a screenshot, which is error-prone -- especially with code snippets, special characters, or non-Latin scripts. PDFs contain the original text, fully searchable without OCR.
Full-page screenshot extensions capture the entire scrollable page as one long image. The result is an unwieldy file that's difficult to print, impossible to search, and very large. A typical full-page screenshot of a long article can be 20-30 MB, while a PDF of the same content is 200-500 KB. The PDF is also paginated, searchable, and accessible -- none of which apply to the screenshot.
Pretty PDF extracts the content and applies a template, so the visual layout differs from the original page. If you need an exact visual replica, a screenshot is more appropriate. If you need the content in a usable, searchable format, PDF is better. Pretty PDF offers 5 templates (Clean, Minimal, Corporate, Academic, Dark) so you can choose the styling that best fits your needs.

Save content, not just pixels

Install Pretty PDF and get searchable, accessible, professionally styled PDFs from any webpage. Free tier included.

Install Free Extension